CSI

media type="custom" key="4717331" My name is Detective Belcher. I'm 24 years old. Two weeks ago I was called to a crime scene at the victoms house, Felix Navidad. His body was found about 3 o'clock. The alleged victim was Felix Navidad.He had a two bedroom 1 bathroom beach house. His parents died in a freak bungy jumping accident and he inherited alot of money and put his friends in his will. The suspect guilty of committing this crime is Kendra Goode she killed Felix Navidad because she wanted to be in his will to get his money. This suspect's guilt was confirmed through the testing and results of evidence collected at the crime scene.

The most incriminating piece of evidence was the Base in the ice and four peices of ice were in the cola that made Felix poisoned and die. The evidence was found near Felixs body tracing in the crime scene. The test performed was Fingerprint that was tested to be Kendra Goodes. The results of the test were Kendras finger prints. This connects the suspect to the crime scene because Felix was poisoned by the ice in the cola and Kendras finger prints on the cup so she had to of put the poison in the ice to posion Felix. (How do you know he was poisoned this way? What tests did you run and what were the results?)

The next piece of evidence collected was the white powder in the cola. It was found on Kendras and Veras shoes. The test performed was the powder study. The results of the test was cornstarch. This connects the suspect to the crime because cornstarch was in the cola that poisoned Felix Navidad.

Another piece of evidence collected was the Note. It was found near the sunglasses and clock.The test performed was the secret note. The results of the test was Kendras Goodes hand writng. This connects the suspect to the crime because we did a test on every possible victom like Alfrado, Gene, Vera and Kendra and the hand writing matched up to Kendra the note said "Dear Martha, Im so glad its over Felix is dead, love Vera" Kendra wrote the note to frame Vera and so that she would not be caught.

The last piece of evidence collected was the towel with Kendras initials. She was the only one involved in the invesigation with the initials K.G. The results of the test were she was there at the crime.The towel was found in the garbagecan in the crime scene. This connects the suspect to the crime because her towel was a Felix's house and that is where he was poisoned.

According to the evidence, the following is an account of the events believed to have gone down on that fateful day. Kendra framed Vera,her finger prints were on the poisoned cup, she poisoned Felix, put white powder and cornstarch in the cup and that proves that Kendra comited the crime of poisoning Felix. (This is supposed to be a step-by-step explaination of how she committed the crime.) Therefore, Kendra Goode committed the crime of poisoning Felix Navidad for his money.

**Rubric for Podcasts** introduction. Provides relevant information and establishes a clear purpose engaging the listener immediately. || **__ Describes the topic and engages the audience as the introduction proceeds. __** || Somewhat engaging (covers well-known topic), and provides a vague purpose. || Irrelevant or inappropriate topic that minimally engages listener. Does not include an introduction or the purpose is vague and unclear. ||^  || 83% ||
 * ** CATEGORY ** || ** Exemplary **  || ** Proficient **  || ** Partially Proficient **  || ** Incomplete **  || ** POINTS **  ||
 * ** Introduction ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || Catchy and clever
 * ^  || **__Tells who is speaking, date the podcast was produced, and where the speaker is located.__**  || Tells most of the following: who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Alludes to who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Speaker is not identified. No production date or location of the speaker is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Content ** || ** 6 points ** || ** 4 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || __**The motive was detailed and clearly based on information delivered throughout the investigation.**__  || The motive is detailed and based on partial information delivered throughout the investigation.  || The motive is not very detailed and is sprinkled with inaccurate information.  || The motive is missing, or unclear or all information is inaccurate.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Four pieces of strong evidence were presented and linked to the suspect in an organized, methodical manner.  || **__ Three or four pieces of evidence were presented and/or linked to the suspect in a somewhat organized, thoughtful manner.  __** || Two pieces of shaky evidence were presented and/or loosely linked to the suspect. Lack of organization.  || One to no pieces of unimportant evidence were presented in an unorganized manner.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || The events in the scenario are detailed, extremely organized and strongly supported with evidence and facts related to the crime scene.  || The events in the scenario are well organized, somewhat detailed, and supported with evidence from the crime scene. || **__The events in the crime scene lack organization, detail, and are weakly supported with evidence from the crime scene.__** || There was no clear direction and evidence was unimportant. ||^   ||
 * ^  || Conclusion clearly summarizes key information.  || Conclusion summarizes information.  || __** Conclusion vaguely summarizes key information  **__ || No conclusion is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Delivery ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 point ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__Well rehearsed, smooth delivery in a conversational style.__**  || Rehearsed, smooth delivery.  || Appears unrehearsed with uneven delivery.  || Delivery is hesitant, and choppy and sounds like the presenter is reading.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Highly effective enunciation and presenter's speech is clear and intelligible, not distant and muddled. Expression, and rhythm keep the audience listening.__** || Enunciation, expression, pacing are effective throughout the podcast.  || Enunciation, expression, rhythm are sometimes distracting during the podcast.  || Enunciation of spoken word is distant and muddled and not clear. Expression and rhythm are distracting throughout the podcast.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__ Correct grammar is used throughout the podcast.  __** || Correct grammar is used during most of the podcast.  || Occasionally incorrect grammar is used during the podcast.  || Poor grammar is used throughout the podcast.  ||^   ||
 * ** Graphic and Music Enhancements ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__ Music enhances the mood, quality, and understanding of the presentation.  __** || Music provides supportive background to the podcast.  || Music provides somewhat distracting background to the podcast.  || Music is distracting to presentation.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__ All music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared with appropriate documentation.  __** || Music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared.  || Use of copyrighted works is questionable.  || Copyright infringement is obvious.  ||^   ||
 * ** Technical Production ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__ Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment without background noise and distractions.  __** || Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment with minimal background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a semi-quiet environment with some background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a noisy environment with constant background noise and distractions.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Transitions are smooth and spaced correctly without noisy, dead space.__**  || Transitions are smooth with a minimal amount of ambient noise.  || Transitions are uneven with inconsistent spacing; ambient noise is present.  || Transitions are abrupt and background noise needs to be filtered.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Volume of voice, music, and effects enhance the presentation.__**  || Volume is acceptable.  || Volume is occasionally inconsistent.  || Volume changes are highly distracting.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Podcast length keeps the audience interested and engaged.__**  || Podcast length keeps audience listening.  || Podcast length is somewhat long or somewhat short to keep audience engaged.  || Podcast is either too long or too short to keep the audience engaged.  ||^   ||
 * ** TOTAL POINTS ** || 47/57